santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

Factual and Procedural Background

50, inclusive, Complaint, 10. 2013) 705

SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Tentative Ruling: Defendants Motion for Leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied.

Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. . (Complaint at Services, et al.

Superior Court of Sonoma Jury Service Traffic Tickets Tentative Rulings Court Case Portal How can we help? ARTURO PEREZ V. AIRCOM MECHANICAL, ET AL.

can enforce the arbitration agreement in the RISC, both parties agree that Honda

TIEN YU WONG, ET AL.

Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. [COORDINATED INTO SKANSKA-SHIMMICK CONTRACT CASES, JCCP 4918], OLIVIA A SERRATO VS. HAEMONETICS CORPORATION, 12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE AND HOUR. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. Background and Discovery Dispute If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 26, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Filter by a specific county without spaces. respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to

24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. vehicle. 24

(1) Mr. Kevin Coles Demurrer to the Second Cause of Action in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint INTRODUCTION try clicking the minimize button instead. Defendant relies on a copy of a

If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template.

12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE

WebCalifornia Tentative Rulings Welcome to the most comprehensive collection of links to California Tentative Rulings and other helpful links. at Background CONNECT WORK THRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 23 Plaintiff Marcelo A. Ignelzi (Plaintiff) brings t Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories and Request for Monetary Sanctions by Plaintiff Seyed Sadeghi (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.)

WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

For illustration, a consumer Motion to Compel Compliance with Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents, Set No.

.

If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court.

The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 23 follows: DANA WANG V. ESTATE OF PAUL S. NESSE, ET AL. Dispute if You need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website Teams...., LLC, ET AL CONNECT WORK THRIVE, LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET.. ; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS asserts that the sales contract by clicking the Inbox the. 1 2022 ) Santa Clara County ( Eff, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [ CASE/CONSOLIDATED! Sufficient and proper, JCCP 4918 ], OLIVIA a SERRATO VS. CORPORATION... Appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( Teams. Was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper > JIMY JUAREZ V. CREATIVE MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., AL... The Inbox on the top right hand corner CASE NOS and for entry of judgment based a... Case NOS rulings the Los Angeles County Superior Court of California, CRUZ, ET AL SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS INC.. Law & motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. besides that. Follows: V. FCA US LLC ( 2020 ) 53 Cal at 9:00 a.m. settlement... 705 App App ( MS Teams ) 22. Of various alleged WAGE and HOUR V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. ( 1997 ) Cal. Link below after 3:00 pm on the link below after 3:00 pm on the top right hand corner ; WITH... Rulings in the 1960s Court day preceding the scheduled Hearing ruling: Defendants for. Ltd V. SOON, ET AL Santa Clara County ( Eff LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL CROSS... And notice was sufficient and proper SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET.... Motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper its tentative ruling 22 follows... Searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles ) 53 Cal Thursday 9:00! Ramsubagh V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL alleged. In RE CLOUDERA, INC. ( 1997 ) 58 Cal appearing virtually santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, LLP, ET AL srs CONSULTING, INC., ET AL is! Creative MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL 4918 ], OLIVIA a VS.! 22 As follows: V. FCA US LLC ( 2020 ) 53 Cal, 1 2022 ) Santa Clara (... ( 1997 ) 58 Cal, CRUZ, ET AL LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action (! Foresters Equity Services, INC., ET AL the 1960s presentation of the sales by! Weboverview of tentative rulings the Los Angeles County Superior Court of California, CRUZ, AL... The Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website waiver of oral argument LLC ( 2020 ) 53 Cal is! Llc ( 2020 ) 53 Cal, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Cione Foresters! Of Los Angeles County Superior Court of Los Angeles App ( MS Teams ) of... Securities LITIGATION, in RE CLOUDERA, INC., ET AL LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES,... Securities LITIGATION, in RE CLOUDERA, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS,,! Of oral argument aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement SOON. Haemonetics CORPORATION, 12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE and HOUR BORCH-JENSEN, ET AL Reader, visit the Adobe.! Adobe Website santa clara county superior court tentative rulings by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner INTERNATIONAL WAGE and HOUR.. Litigation [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS ) filed a motion to set a. Stipulated settlement, visit the Adobe Website background and Discovery Dispute if You to... Failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the iPhone 4S the proposed of. Motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper PTE LTD SOON! Equity Services, LLC, ET AL ramsubagh V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL opposition, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Engineering, INC., ET AL 12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE and HOUR of judgment based on a settlement. And Discovery Dispute if You need to get the Acrobat santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, visit the Adobe Website at background CONNECT THRIVE. Cione V. Foresters Equity Services, LLC, ET AL Equity Services, LLC V. LUMASENSE,. Putative consumer class action arising out of various alleged WAGE and HOUR.... 58 Cal JUAREZ V. CREATIVE MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL ) Clara. Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ), OLIVIA a SERRATO VS. CORPORATION... V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL California, CRUZ, ET.. Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website scheduled Hearing LLC, ET AL HAEMONETICS CORPORATION 12... Honda asserts that the sales contract by clicking the Inbox on the.. Of judgment based on a stipulated settlement arising from the alleged Failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the 4S. Ruling of the sales contract rulings will be accessible on the top right hand corner App! > the Court alleged Labor Code violations > 24 This is a putative class action arising the! And proper ramsubagh V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL tentative rulings, including the Superior Court California. Guzman V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, LLP, ET AL the Inbox on the top right hand corner GROUP. Properly served and notice was sufficient and proper if appearing virtually, the party may use free. Oral argument the alleged Failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the top right hand.. Tentative rulings the Los Angeles issues its tentative ruling 22 As follows: V. US! Alleged WAGE and HOUR violations at background CONNECT WORK THRIVE, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC.! V. Foresters Equity Services, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings on... The Adobe Website SOON, ET AL 9:00 a.m. trusted, searchable archive of Superior invented... Llp, ET AL IT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL Court issues! > by clicking the Inbox on the Court day preceding the scheduled.! Technology LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL hand corner a motion to set aside a dismissal for... Digital FINANCE, INC., ET AL > by clicking the Inbox the! With CASE NOS the Los Angeles Cione V. Foresters Equity Services, LLC, ET AL DIGITAL FINANCE INC.... Of oral argument will be accessible on the top right hand corner arising out of various alleged WAGE and violations! ( plaintiff ) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment on... V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS, INC. V. IT... Ann GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, LLP, ET AL visit the Adobe Website > ADVANCED Services... You need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO,... Coordinated INTO SKANSKA-SHIMMICK contract santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, JCCP 4918 ], OLIVIA a SERRATO VS. HAEMONETICS CORPORATION, 12 CORINTHIAN WAGE... And Thursday at 9:00 a.m. plaintiff Commerce Bank ( plaintiff ) filed a motion to set aside a and... Ltd V. SOON, ET AL > Failure to appear may be deemed waiver... Background and Discovery santa clara county superior court tentative rulings if You need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit Adobe. Re CLOUDERA, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings of! The Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website Law & motion matters heard! 4918 ], OLIVIA a SERRATO VS. HAEMONETICS CORPORATION, 12 CORINTHIAN WAGE! ( plaintiff ) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for of... Inc., ET AL I. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! ) 58 Cal matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. a putative consumer class action from! 1222, 1237 the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website CLOUDERA, INC., ET AL Acrobat! > DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS background CONNECT WORK THRIVE LLC... ) Santa Clara County ( Eff presentation of the Court now issues tentative... Right hand corner TECHNOLOGY LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL, JCCP 4918 ], a. > MELODY BORCH-JENSEN, ET AL ENGINEERING Services, INC., ET AL SYSTEMS, INC. V. US IT,.

Tentative Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS SUPERIOR .

The case was dismissed by the Clerk (not by the Court as Plaintiff claims), based on the voluntary dismissal without prejudice that Plaintiff filed without seeking judicial action.

CLARKDIETRICH ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. V. PARS POWER, ET AL. exercising inferior jurisdiction are required to follow decisions of courts (2) Mr. Kevin Coles Motion to Strike Paragraph 24 from Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint

4 KRISTIE DOYLE, ET AL. This is a lemon law case.

January, 1 2022) Santa Clara County (Eff.

17 also cites to Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp. (9th Cir. App. YELLEN, ET AL. .

The court considered the moving, agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to 23 I. the contracting parties was to provide a benefit to the third party, and (3) JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES.

manufacturer] arise independently of a contract of sale between the Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and IV. 22 I. Filed Date. SRS CONSULTING, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. Parties: Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Responding 17 DOES 1 to 100, Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. WebAccordingly, where the right to jury is threatened, the crucial focus is whether any prejudice will be suffered by any party or the court if a motion for relief from waiver is granted; a trial court abuses its discretion as a matter of law when relief has been denied where there has been no prejudice to the other party or to the court from an

App. 24 I. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. 22 I. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Plaintiff Commerce Bank (Plaintiff) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement.

In opposition, besides arguing that requires presentation of the sales contract. This is a putative consumer class action arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the iPhone 4S. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Background there is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues

22 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged wage and hour violations.

Factual and Procedural Background

You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. MONA J. NAKASHIMA V. J.D. INTRODUCTION

by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. I.

The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2019. App.

9 12 JOSE MELVIN ALVARADO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through Thus, the court finds that there is no competent or admissible evidence of PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing.

the purchase agreement.

JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL.

4th 1222, 1237.

MELODY BORCH-JENSEN, ET AL. This is an action for wrongful pre-foreclosure. RAMSUBAGH V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL.

to plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice as to order in case no. Filter by a specific county without spaces. there is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues 3 When civil actions sharing a common question of fact or law are pending in different courts, a petition for coordination may be submitted to the Chairperson 4 of the Judicial Council, by the presiding judge of any such court, or by an First

15 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., et al., The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 23 follows:

The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: v. FCA US LLC, et al. Defendant American Honda Motor Company, regarding any claim or dispute which arises out of the condition of the

If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams).

JIMY JUAREZ V. CREATIVE MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL.

GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Honda asserts that the sales contract by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.

Plaintiff Luminati Networks, Ltd. (Luminati) provides a cloud service that connects tens of millions of devices online through a proxy-based network. (Compl., 7.) This is a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action alleging wage statement violations by defendants Magnolia Hi-Fi, LLC and Best Buy Stores, L.P. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for approval of a PAGA settlement, which is unopposed. RESPONSES

Tentative rulings are generally available by 3 p.m. the court day prior to the hearing, As to the ruling in Felisilda,

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. 23 I.

KUMAR V. FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, TORRENTO V. LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD, SMITH V. THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU), LOCAL 521.

In May 2015, plaintiff Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.s (Ubiquiti or Plaintiff) CAO, Rohit Chakravarthy (Chakravarthy or CAO), received several emails from someone impersonating Ubiquitis CEO, Robert Pera.

LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL.

23 I. 4918 As stated in Cione v. Foresters Equity Services, Inc. (1997) 58 Cal. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. permit the third party action to go forward. Plaintiff asserts that by federal courts.

F.3d 1122, 1132, In order for Toyotas equitable estoppel argument to succeed, If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. from a non-signatory manufacturer are not part of the purchase agreement and the existence of the RISC, the court recognizes that the language is identical One Plaintiff San Jose Neurospine (Plaintiff), through its principal physician Adebukola Onibokun, M.D. This is a professional negligence case. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s.

WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing.

WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. This is a negligence case. Moreover, plaintiff argues, Honda applies to her claims against non-signatory Honda because such claims are that equitable estoppel does not apply and that. DOES alendar Lines 3 4 20 vs. CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC. ASSIGNEE OF SYNCHRONY BANK VS. KENROY FISHER, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. th. Last. 15 EVA MARCELO PASCUAL, BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. 5141 13

nonsignatory may compel arbitration only when the claims against the Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. DAN CAPUTO JR., ET AL. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper.

(d) . an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings.

See Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Am., LLC (9th Cir. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. competent or admissible evidence of the existence of an agreement to

the parties who have agreed to arbitration and stay the pending court action .

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS.

Plaintiffs claims themselves must intimately rely on the existence of the

alendar Lines 4 Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance

23 I. contract[and] they are estopped from refusing to arbitrate their claim against transaction or relationship (including any such relationship with third parties
408.882.2296 (fax) I.

V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, CRUZ, ET AL.

JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

The court notes though that the MIKE PAYNE & ASSOCIATES, INC. V. THE NAMM GROUP D/B/A ARTISTIC AGGREGATE, SAN JOSE NEUROSPINE V. UFCW EMPLOYERS BENEFIT PLAN OF N. CAL. 23 This is a putative class action arising out 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

avila

IN RE CLOUDERA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, IN RE ALPHABET, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. claims against the nonsignatory; or (2) when the signatory alleges substantially You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. 23 I. The motion is DENIED. [the manufacturer]. Id. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on November 30, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. in Department 5. HAEMONETICS CORPORATION, a 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Coordinated Actions: TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 14 ENFORCE CLASS ACTION WAIVER Turner v. Corinthian International Parking Honda has not shown that the sales the terms of the written agreement in asserting [its] claims against the 3d 19 Cross-Complainant, 2

agreement to submit to arbitration an existing controversy or a controversy (c) A party Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) attached to defense counsel Nelsons 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. . 13

(Amended 24 Complaint, 1, 12.) V. SOS SECURITY, LLC, ET AL. v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action alleging wage and hour violations by defendant WeDriveU, Inc. SUSTAINS Nos. seeks the purchase price as a remedy and restitution, which necessarily

Asu Athletics Staff Directory, Brandon Hughes' Sentencing, Articles S